Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Feb 2009 20:25 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Permalink for comment 348770
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
Reading the article, the title here is only half the story.
The copyright portion is total BS (although Apple is trying to claim this, yes). The bigger push is that this is a DMCA violation, which technically that may be true. the DMCA is pure crap, but currently it's law.
Really the answer here is that people shouldn't buy Apple products if they don't want to get abused. Same argument that's made with Microsoft. The biggest deal is that Apple doesn't hold a monopoly on the market which means people don't have to buy their stuff to still be able to use products and services.