Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Feb 2009 12:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 348984
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-14
If you say that a Qt license is expensive you do not now anything about managing a company, not anything about software licences, not anything about software development and not anything about economics.
The licenses of Qt are not expensive at all.
Of course, if you're just an amateur developer sitting in your bedroom, it IS expensive. But it is not for companies making software.
I can easily show you software that is 100 times more expensive PER USER than Qt. And even then, nobody leaves some sleep about purchasing it.