Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Feb 2009 20:25 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Permalink for comment 349028
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-01
Oh, you mean bullshit like copyright law and consumer rights? I'm sure Apple's lawyers appreciate your willingness to bend over. "
Did Apple hide the facts concerning the nature of the iPod or iPhone? I don't belive so, so your argument falls flat. It's not about bending over, it's about opening your eyes and reading the small print. I knew the restrictions when I got my iPhone. I got my iPhone because I tried other options, including open ones, and realized they were all flawed. At the end of the day I got a capable media device with installable apps that does exactly what I need it to. It replaced my N800, 5th gen iPod and SE k750i in one device.
No, because they're are trying to control what you can do with a product that you have bought and own. "
I bought mine on a contract. I don't "own" it for another 18 months. I possess it, which is not the same thing by a long shot.