Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Feb 2009 12:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 349129
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-09
I'm not sure you understood the original comments - using QT for all platforms would leave it a second class citizen on OS X (no idea about Windows).
Non-native apps stick out nastily - you can nearly always tell it's 'different'.
It's like Java - sure you can make a working cross platform app, but it will be hated by many users because it feels so wrong.
Google have done the right thing for Chrome -> the back-end is cross platform C/C++, the front end will be 'native' on each platform. Unlike Firefox, which feels awful on OS X (for example).