Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Feb 2009 14:07 UTC
Editorial Late last week we ran a story on how the Google Chrome team had decided to use Gtk+ as the graphical toolkit for the Linux version of the Chrome web browser. It was a story that caused some serious debate on a variety of aspects, but in this short editorial, I want to focus on one aspect that came forward: the longing for consistency. Several people in the thread stated they were happy with Google's choice for purely selfish reasons: they use only Gtk+ applications on their GNOME desktops. Several people chimed in to say that Qt integrates nicely in a Gtk+ environment. While that may be true from a graphical point of view, that really isn't my problem with mixing toolkits. The issue goes a lot deeper than that.
Permalink for comment 349270
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: OMG
by segedunum on Mon 16th Feb 2009 15:29 UTC in reply to "RE: OMG"
Member since:

Dear lord, you really missed the point, didn't you? Read the article (which you clearly did not) and then comment again.

Exactly what point would this be when the application that kicked all this off is about as non-native on any platform as you can get? There's a certain irony there.

There isn't even a proposed solution in there, or at least one that will actually work, and it finishes off by saying that people can use what they want anyway. Choosing your applications via the toolkit that your desktop uses is going to leave you with precious little, and the vast majority just won't do it so you're in a minority.

Reply Parent Score: 2