Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Feb 2009 14:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 349538
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-26
That's because taking someone to court just cuz you don't like what they're doing, and feel it's hurting your business is not actually just cause for taking them to court in the first place. They abuse the process by citing as many possible possible crimes so that they can hope *something* will stick as you mentioned.
It's quite abusive IMO - the justice systems have become breeding ground for revenge on people and businesses who just happened to find a way to hurt another's monetary business revenue, even if it's indirect.
Anyhow, I hope it's proven that the services TPB provides are not actually criminal, and they're simply being abused by the real "criminals" - the consumers themselves who have no respect for copyrights and are willing to share copyrighted works freely without any permission or regrets.
Now, on the other hand, I'm of the opinion that copyright laws should not be as strong as they are now - I even recently started putting together some questions to ask people to find where people draw the line between criminal copyright infringement, and fair use... I should publish that sometime