Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Feb 2009 14:07 UTC
Editorial Late last week we ran a story on how the Google Chrome team had decided to use Gtk+ as the graphical toolkit for the Linux version of the Chrome web browser. It was a story that caused some serious debate on a variety of aspects, but in this short editorial, I want to focus on one aspect that came forward: the longing for consistency. Several people in the thread stated they were happy with Google's choice for purely selfish reasons: they use only Gtk+ applications on their GNOME desktops. Several people chimed in to say that Qt integrates nicely in a Gtk+ environment. While that may be true from a graphical point of view, that really isn't my problem with mixing toolkits. The issue goes a lot deeper than that.
Permalink for comment 349588
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
reinouts
Member since:
2005-07-20


Here's an example that illustrates how bad it is:

In Epiphany, the tab bar is at the top. This makes sense for a web browser. In GNOME Terminal, the tab bar is again at the top. This makes absolutely no sense for a terminal app. The HIG fails when it preaches consistency above senses.


Please show us where in the HIG ( http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/controls-notebooks.h... ) it says you have to put your tab bar at the top? It's not much more than the Gtk+ default. In fact there's an Epiphany extension to put tabs on the side.

You may or may not be right about the tab positioning, but don't blame the HIG without backing it up.

Reply Parent Score: 1