Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Sep 2005 19:40 UTC, submitted by _LH_
Permalink for comment 34970
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
---
The people running Mono need to address the licensing issues or shut the project down.
Why can't Novell do something like they did with linux?
Agreed.
Mono should get the IP issue clarified or GET OFF THE LINUX PLATFORM.
If you don't understand what FREE means then you need to build your own OS and take your RISK with you.
Additionally, Mono should label it's site:
NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE.
You need to honestly step up to the plate and specify the RISKS involved with the use of Mono.
By the way, great name.
I get it: Mono: the linux infection.