Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Feb 2009 23:28 UTC
Permalink for comment 349758
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Oh come on ... get real. Linux uses loadable modules ... if you don't have the hardware they don't get loaded, they stay on the hard disk. One can SEE the source code to verify that this is so. One can even remove the hardware interroagtion on boot if one wants to (because one has no intention of ever changing hardware, and therefore doesn't require plug-n-play) and one can blacklist whatever drivers one pleases ... and again one can see the code that does all this and can verify that it does what it is supposed to do.
Finally, I can just delete any driver I don't like.
Vista DRM OTOH ... try removing it or disabling it (even if your machine does not have a HD optical drive you can't do it).
How do you know? Have you seen the code? What does Vista actually DO with all the CPU time it uses, if not DRM polling?
And I repeat for the slow of uptake ... why can't I have a version of Vista without it, if my system can't process HD content anyway?
Well, that is unarguable. This is a problem too. Agreed.
Unsupported assertion. Your statements are as much speculation as mine, despite your apparent vehemence.
Edited 2009-02-19 05:22 UTC