Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Feb 2009 23:28 UTC
Permalink for comment 349774
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Well, look at it this way... whatever performance issues that Vista has, Windows 7 (with the same level or DRM) doesn't have the same issues. So either they found a way to properly optimize the DRM, or else the performance issues in Vista aren't related to DRM.
Either way, just wait for Windows 7 to come out, which isn't slow like Vista is, so you won't have a reason to bitch about it anymore. "
The performance issues with Vista will still remain (in Vista) even after Windows 7 is released.
Waiting for the arrival of Windows 7 is no solution for many of the people who have been unfortunate enough to have been sold a Vista machine.
As far as my waiting for Windows 7 goes ... I have been clued in enough to have avoided Vista so far ... why would I possibly have any interest at all in letting someone try to sucker me into using Windows 7?