Linked by Kroc Camen on Tue 24th Feb 2009 14:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 350530
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Their deal with Novell is a good counter-example to your claim.
They went to Novell, and made a deal along the lines of ... if you promise not to sue our customers over patents, then we won't sue yours. That probably sounded OK to Novel.
As soon as the deal was signed, Microsoft then blurted "all you users of Linux (other than Novell's) have an 'undisclosed liability' to Microsoft - Ballmer". They then tried to pressure Red Hat into a similar deal ... already having signed one with Novell over the same codebase!
If Microsoft truly want to protect their customers from patent threats from Linux and FOSS, such that they feel the need to sign patent covenants ... then what would be wrong with Microsoft just joining in the Patent Commons and the OIN ... that way they would get exactly the same protetction from patents for their customers for free!