Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Feb 2009 10:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 350714
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-25
Uhm, no. In reality, Linux (I don't really care what Distro you use) does internet supremely well, much better than windows, especially in the realm of stability. What it has lacked in the past is useability, but that is rapidly changing. In Ubuntu Hardy Heron (the latest, I believe) my ralink wifi adapter works right out of the first installation. The version before (forget the name) required installation of external drivers and command line configuration. Thats ONE version iteration, which speaks to the pace of Linux development. Dial-up has always been supported, once again the failing factor was useability, not lack.
VPN has always been excellent considering it was Unix R&D that invented it, and doesn't cost anything. Similar packages (until recently when once again OSS came to the rescue) for Windows used to be very expensive.
Please speak of these matters using FACTS, sir.