Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 28th Feb 2009 11:47 UTC
Permalink for comment 351100
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-12
Thom has posted his opinion as the 'true guru of interface design' and since Safari does not fit his world view, it must be a disaster. His opinion is irrelevant - just let users decide ..
I don't believe in 'all interfaces must look the same'. I believe in 'all interfaces should use the same underlying concepts' which users can learn and apply to any new application. Safari 4 on the Mac is not a problem in that respect. I. e. I don't see the problem where the title bar and the task bar can be mixed up. And as a public beta, I believe it is a good application to test new UI concepts.
BTW: I'd like to read an interface rant from Thom about some of the really annoying disasters in Windows (but I guess Thom is too much of a Windows fan for that). Ever stumped upon the "widget mode" of task manager? Or the situation where the 'up' in Explorer behaves like 'back'? Or the annoying 'we don't like to show menu entries that you didn't use often enough - go searching for them, idiot!'. Or .. (I could list countless other annoying interface faults and misfits in Windows - all done by MS itself).