Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 28th Feb 2009 11:47 UTC
Permalink for comment 351135
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-09
Change and progress are *not* synonymous words.
Change become progress only when it's better after than before. Resisting a change that make things worse make as much sense than embracing one who does improve them. You can't say resistance to change is wrong until you've enough proof this change is better than before.
It's not like human history lacks example of change that was promoted like the best thing since fire and were in the end disaster...
Back to topic, Safari's UI strongness or weakness will never rank very high in human history biggest changes, so...
Doesn't make automatically Safari 4 on Windows the best browser change in the recent period, maybe because on *this* platform people saw another one recently, called Chrome, against they made comparison. In particular when these browsers both share same WebKit engine below, it make much sense to compare its user interface experience...
Since long and among pretty much every windows managers, the "Title Bar" space/value rate is very, very low. The fact people see it more obviously today with the browser title bar is only because that's more and more pretty much the only app they open...