Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Feb 2009 10:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 351141
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-01-24
This is the true reason why Apple cannot be the #2 competitor of MS and all the computer makers in all the countries.
IBM tried to recapture control of the PC market by introducing an advanced proprietary architecture, the IBM PS/2 computer and they failed. IBM-PC was a success because it was an open hardware made by many companies.
While Apple insists to sell its OS tied to a proprietary hardware it will never have chance to compete with Microsoft. Linux is open, runs in the same open architecture (PCs) and many other architectures, from MMU-less processors to supercomputers. And it is as solid as MacOS X because of the common Unix heritage.