Linked by Nik Tripp on Mon 2nd Mar 2009 21:40 UTC
Permalink for comment 351377
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
Thin-clients have their uses. However, if you want to do anything beyond simple web browsing and office document work, you just can't use thin-client setups. All the processing is done on the server, and the output is pumped down through the network. Try doing anything with audio, 3D, full-motion/full-screen video, or even a lab full of students hitting youtube, and you can bring even a gigabit network to a grinding halt.
Diskless setups are where it's at. You get all the administrative benfits of a thin-client setup (all the software is installed on the server), but you get all the benfits of local PC (all software is run on the local CPU, using local RAM, local video/soundcards). You still have systems with no harddrive, no optical disk, no floppy, basically just a motherboard and case. But you can do so much more!
We've migrated our local school district off Windows and onto LTSP ... and then over to a diskless setup using standard Debian 4.0. With full nVidia 3D support, local sound, full USB support, basically everything you can do with a local install of Debian.
Thin-client has its uses ... but it's days are really numbered in Unix-land.