Linked by Nik Tripp on Mon 2nd Mar 2009 21:40 UTC
Permalink for comment 351762
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
Yes, it's interesting the cycles that computing technlogy goes in. First the mainframe and dumb-terminals, then the mini-computer and dumb-terminas, then the server and PC client, then PCs as thin-clients, then dedicated thin-clients which are basically almost dumb-terminals. Looking at some of the blade-server setups, they almost even look like mainframes.
Point-of-sale, kiosks (like in bookstores and airports), bank terminals, even some Internet cafe setups really benefit from thin-client setups, whether using dedicated hardware or recycled PCs. Basically, anywhere that you only run one or two applications (period, not at a time) can be moved to thin-client setups.
It still amazes me to sit across from a bank teller who has a full-blown Windows XP computer (full tower and everything) ... just to run a terminal emulator. Put a dedicated terminal there instead!!