Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 352257
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-02
I find especially the following part of the US law interesting:
It seems that the 'adaptation' part refers to changing the software. And if so, it would seem I am allowed to change the software in such a way that it does not display the EULA to me, as this can be seen as "an essential step in the utilization" (since with the EULA, I cannot install it on such a machine, but without it I can). Which would circumventing the EULA be legal.
JAL