Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Permalink for comment 352262
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The right question
by sonic2000gr on Mon 9th Mar 2009 11:24 UTC
sonic2000gr
Member since:
2007-05-20

The right question to ask is:

Will the action of installing MacOSX in a non-Apple machine constitute a copyright breach?

Having legally purchased the OS at a shelf, without agreeing to anything, the EULA is simply an agreement with me and Apple. They can deny to support this installation, but they cannot get me to court for copyright reasons. In more than a few countries even EULA means next to nothing: you didn't read it before buying, you did not sign it, there were no witnesses and the event was not recorded anywhere.

Reply Score: 4