Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Permalink for comment 352317
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Uhm...
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 9th Mar 2009 19:02 UTC in reply to "RE: Uhm..."
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

I see you don't understand open source. Let me make it simple.

Open source licenses: grants rights on a copyrighted work that you would not have under copyright law.

EULAs: take rights away on a copyrighted work that you would have under copyright law.

That's an enormous difference. By law, consumers are granted rights. Apple takes these rights away for the sole purpose of harming consumers by limiting choice and advancing lock-in.

This is in NO WAY comparable to GPL lawsuits.

Reply Parent Score: 2