Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 352335
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softman_v._Adobe
"selling as individual units the software titles that were purchased from Adobe as a single boxed ***"Collection" ***. The individual titles had their own CDs."
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/5628
"So does this mean Linux users can break up a hardware/software bundle, keep the hardware to run Linux on and sell the software? Yes, says attorney Wendy Seltzer, Fellow of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School. "It makes a strong case that the licenses purporting to restrict resale in this manner are not valid licenses--so the transactions are in fact sales, and the buyers are not subject to the "license" conditions. It helped that Softman hadn't even had to click a clickwrap", Seltzer said in an e-mail interview."
-----
#1 Psystar install the OS and Agree to the term of EULA.
#2 they are not breaking an Apple system/bundle as they buy the OS *upgrade* only and not the hardware
#3 Apple is not suing Psystar over it's EULA.
Charges copyright, trademark infringement, violation of OS X software license ( << not the same as EULA )
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleB...
"In an order signed on Friday, U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup gave Psystar the go-ahead to amend its lawsuit against Apple. According to Alsup, Psystar may change that countersuit, which originally accused Apple of breaking antitrust laws, to instead ague that Apple has stretched copyright laws by tying the Mac operating system to its hardware."
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleB...