Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Permalink for comment 352337
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by lurch_mojoff
by gcbirzan on Mon 9th Mar 2009 21:16 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by lurch_mojoff"
gcbirzan
Member since:
2009-03-09

FYI, there is nothing wrong with tying your product to the products of another company. The console gaming industry proves this point quite nicely.

Except it's illegal. From wikipedia:
Certain tying arrangements are illegal in the United States under both the Sherman Antitrust Act,[1], and Section 3 of the Clayton Act.[2] A tying arrangement is defined as "an agreement by a party to sell one product but only on the condition that the buyer also purchases a different (or tied) product, or at least agrees he will not purchase the product from any other supplier."


Basically, the idea isn't that it doesn't work on other operating systems, just that they cannot stop me if I want to use it on another operating system (and find a way to do so).

The simple fact is, companies do have the right to restrict how you use their products. It has been litigated repeatedly. Go take a look and see how far the bnetd guys got.

That was a different issue, they were going on about piracy, the ability to play on a local server without having bought a license.

Reply Parent Score: 2