Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Permalink for comment 352355
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Again, I'm not sure how any of that is relevant besides proving my point. Are you trying to say that this is applicable in the Pystar case? How? Which claim of Psystar's would be able to use this lawsuit as precedent?


You brought in Psystar - not me.

We are talking about product tying. You brought forth gaming consoles as an example of tying being allowed - and I showed you a high-profile lawsuit which stated that that tying is actually NOT allowed.

Psystar never came into our argument, so I have no idea why you're bringing it in now - apart from the obvious fact of course that you want to shift the attention away from an argument you were losing, but I'll forgive you for that.

Reply Parent Score: 1