Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Permalink for comment 352377
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Unfortunately...
by Delgarde on Tue 10th Mar 2009 00:51 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Unfortunately..."
Delgarde
Member since:
2008-08-19

Unlike a piece of software, when you lend a book to friends (or whoever else), you don't have the original anymore until you get it back. With software, you can 'loan' it to a friend, and a million other people in the process, and still keep the original.


True for books, but software still isn't unique in that regard. For CDs and DVDs, a user can copy them to a computer or portable player, and loan the physical media to someone else. Yet the question of licensing doesn't come up with those - nobody buys a CD or DVD and has to agree to a EULA before they can listen to or watch it. Where's the law that says different rules apply to software, distributed on the same media?

I buy a movie on DVD, I have an right to use it. I buy a game on DVD, I don't? Why's software different?

Reply Parent Score: 1