Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Permalink for comment 352469
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
tttm
Member since:
2009-03-10

I understand the argument put forward for why Apple should not be able to enforce any restrictions of use from the sale of its stand alone software, in this case OSX. And further more, I agree with your argument. I do not want to be dictated to regarding how I can or should use a product I have legally purchased.

However, your argument does not distinguish between for personal use vs for profit. In the case of Pystar, they are using Apple's software, installed on their hardware, to sell their product and compete directly against Apple.

If Pystar was not using Apple's software in this way, would they still have a legitimate business?

Is it right for a company, like Pystar to use Apple's own software to compete and take further business away from Apple?

I say no, not without proper license from Apple, which it has not given.

Reply Score: 1