Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Apple Numerous irrelevant issues and feelings about them are ventilated in comments on the case. However, there are only two important issues. One is what the law is, the other is what we think the law should be.
Permalink for comment 352492
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Whose boat is it?
by GCrain on Tue 10th Mar 2009 16:32 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Whose boat is it?"
GCrain
Member since:
2005-07-11

"But what about if you modify and possibly compromise the Mercury engines the way you want and them resell them as Mercury engines? Is it your right to be able to do that? What happens when the modified Mercury engine blows up... who's responsible??
Naturally, if your modifications were unsafe or caused accidents than you WOULD be liable. Exactly the same for Psystar; if the modifications to OSX cause computers to blow up, then Psystar, not Apple, is liable. Your point? "

Where lies the Apple - Psystar liability? They are using MacOS, which is branded by Apple. You supposedly bought a retail version of MacOS-there is some inherent liability back to Apple. If MacOS installed on Psystar computers inflicts damage in some way, it WILL be associated with Apple. Apple has a right to protect themselves. Psystar is an opportunistic little company with no money. Even if they are 100% liable, they would not be the target.

Reply Parent Score: 1