Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 352513
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 21:46 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-12
The thing you're missing is that in the course of acquisition and use of all sorts of computer components, we all make money from each other. We write software - we use IDEs. We assemble parts into proper machines. We install operating systems and software and charge for doing it. We go in and fix malware infected machines, using anti virus software, or disk recovery software. We charge.
You will never get your head around this if you keep thinking it is mainly about Apple. It is not, the issues of principle are about the industry as a whole. The way to think about this is, after you figure out you want Apple to have a given power, figure out what will happen to the industry if everyone has that power, and uses it. Think about MS, think about Adobe, think about hardware vendors, ATI or Intel or nVidia.
Then start thinking about publishers of books, people who make drugs, people who make tools.
Then you'll get a feeling for what really is socially desirable and what's not.