Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 352517
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-09
Should I be allowed to install Windows XP for someone without permission from MS?
Same thing.
What you're missing is what the restriction is. The only purpose of that is to take choice away from its customers, choice over something totally unrelated. Somebody put it quite nicely, saying that it would be akin to book publishers saying you're only allowed to read their books with their prescription glasses.
Not allowing customers to make a choice is something that most legal systems frawn upon.