Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Mar 2009 23:21 UTC
At the end of January this year, I wrote a rather harsh, but honest article on the state of SkyOS. I was very worried that the closed-source operating system, for which users have to pay in order to beta test it, would never reach a final version, something that was promised to the people paying the price. This feeling was strengthened by a lack of updates; we were five months without news, six months without a release, and 8 months without a changelog update. My article got the ball rolling, but now that we're five weeks down the road, is that ball still rolling?
Permalink for comment 353017
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2007-03-29
But that's not relevant. ZETA was a pirated copy [1] of BeOS so they had no choice. SkyOS have no such issues.
Nick.
[1] http://www.bitsofnews.com/content/view/5498/44/ "
That was only after Korz had announced that he ceases ZETA development and mulled about open-sourcing it.
Up to that point, the lack of transparency is what makes both businesses similar. Apart from that both were closed-source and did not collect donations but sold a product, part of which was a promise for future improvement, which both failed to deliver.
Again, you cannot have customers and then complain that they start behaving like customers...