Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Mar 2009 17:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 353311
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-24
If that's the case, and as long as Intel doesn't get paid twice, and as long as the cost is the same, that at least sort of sounds reasonable. Otherwise, I'd say that the situation needs to be monitored by the office of the Attorney General and the EC. After years of Microsoft's antics, I don't have a lot of patience left over for any Intel shenanigans. But at least I can vote with my wallet, depending upon how it turns out.