Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Mar 2009 11:48 UTC, submitted by PLan
Permalink for comment 353781
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I assume you mean from the point of view that as an organisation becomes larger and more bureaucratic that it becomes more difficult to respond to changes; its like turning around a massive boat, it takes a lot of time. By the time the boat has changed directions Microsoft might already have 80% of the market place.
There is a risk of that but I have a feeling that there are some great ideas in Sun that simply need the financing required and IBM has that money to turn many of these good ideas into real products as part of their larger strategy.