Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Mar 2009 06:44 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Permalink for comment 353933
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
They used Safari 4 running on an up-to-date version of Leopard, versus the latest Windows 7 and IE8, so it's possible that whatever bug was exploited is fixed in 10.6 or the latest WebKit nightlies, but I'd be very surprised. On the face of things it seems like a pretty fair competition.
From canwestsec.com:
On the browser side, we will be running the latest bleeding edge version of each browser platform we can get our hands on (Yes that means the Safari 4 beta, the latest build of IE8 we can get our hands on, and the upcoming FireFox release) on each of the two prize laptops (for the corresponding multi-os browsers). "
So a beta browser on OS X is cracked, and a beta browser on a beta operating system is cracked (Win7).
Does anyone know if these exploits are also in the production versions of the browsers/OS's in question? Because otherwise this feat of cracking a beta product is somewhat diminished.
I for one don't run beta browsers or OS's on anything other than test machines or VM's, never in a production environment where security is a concern.