Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Privacy, Security, Encryption Fresh from winning the PWN2OWN contest yesterday, Charlie Miller has been interviewed by ZDNet. He talks about how Mac OS X is a very simple operating system to exploit due to the lack of any form of anti-exploit features. He also explains that the underlying operating system is much more important in creating a successful exploit than the bowser, why Chrome is so hard to hack, and many other things.
Permalink for comment 354156
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by sadyc
by wannabe geek on Fri 20th Mar 2009 17:23 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by sadyc"
wannabe geek
Member since:
2006-09-27

Why not blame FORD executives for refusing to buy the information about defective cars, thereby exposing their customers to the risk?

I'm with Miller on this one, to some extent. Selling the information to criminals would be wrong, but I don't think anyone should work for free for closed-source, IP-paranoid company who boasts making a highly secure and usable operating system. In fact, I'd say it would be extremely shortsighted to help these companies for free instead of contributing to improve FOSS alternatives. Remember the exploit is not just about Webkit, not even about Safari. The whole OS matters for the exploit, and OSX is not open source.

Reply Parent Score: 3