Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Permalink for comment 354261
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-02-26
OpenBSD has a lot of measures no other OS uses or has started to use only recently(eg. ASLR in Win and Linux) which make the very few bugs very difficult(as in almost impossible) to exploit.
As the interviewee makes clear, it is this sort of thing, ASLR, sandboxes, stack canaries, etc. that make an attacker's life difficult.
*BSD and MacOS X have been disregarding those features because they negatively affect performance, and now they are reaping the fruits of shame.
Bugs might be a lot or a handful, but if you do nothing to keep the attackers' from playing around with your unpatched bugs, the game is over for you.