Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Privacy, Security, Encryption Fresh from winning the PWN2OWN contest yesterday, Charlie Miller has been interviewed by ZDNet. He talks about how Mac OS X is a very simple operating system to exploit due to the lack of any form of anti-exploit features. He also explains that the underlying operating system is much more important in creating a successful exploit than the bowser, why Chrome is so hard to hack, and many other things.
Permalink for comment 354287
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by sadyc
by bousozoku on Sat 21st Mar 2009 06:23 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by sadyc"
bousozoku
Member since:
2006-01-23

A web browser is not just its rendering engine.

If it was, Chrome would have the same vulnerabilities as Safari.

Please learn to shut up when you don't know what you're talking about.


If a vulnerability lies in WebKit, what about open source would say that Google didn't modify WebKit?

You're right that Safari isn't totally open source but that doesn't mean that the vulnerabilities aren't in the open source portions.

I don't use Safari on either platform because I don't trust Apple since they don't seem to care. Mozilla's Firefox developers care more but there are still plenty of vulnerabilities and it's completely open source and users still get hosed.

Reply Parent Score: 2