Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Privacy, Security, Encryption Fresh from winning the PWN2OWN contest yesterday, Charlie Miller has been interviewed by ZDNet. He talks about how Mac OS X is a very simple operating system to exploit due to the lack of any form of anti-exploit features. He also explains that the underlying operating system is much more important in creating a successful exploit than the bowser, why Chrome is so hard to hack, and many other things.
Permalink for comment 354295
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
PlatformAgnostic
Member since:
2006-01-02

It's pretty costly to develop an exploit against a Vista flaw. From Immunity Inc:
http://www.immunitysec.com/downloads/ApologyofOdays.pdf

Page 37: From Bug to Reliable Exploit on Win2k - ~12 days

Page 38: SP2/2k3 - ~20 days

Page 39: Vista - ~40 days

If it takes that amount of time for an expert researcher who is known in the 'grey' community for coming up with exploits for difficult areas, then chances are good that the average pre-packaged vulnerability will be quite expensive and a lot of potentially purchasers will become discouraged.

Also if the learning curve for exploit writing is steep enough maybe people will stop looking so hard (who's going to spend that much of their life looking for something when few people ever succeed?).

Reply Parent Score: 3