Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 23:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 354323
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-15
I read the engadget report and thought wow missing the point. I would say half of the points are completely irrelevant.
For example: Kernel adaptibility? WHO FREAKENS cares... These are not PC's where you install. These are dedicated devices where the producer of the device will make sure things work.
Or how about UI skinning, again we are not talking PC. We are talking dedicated device.
Here are some stats I would have liked to compare:
Readability for youngsters, older people, etc.
One hand usability, where people who are standing in a bus or train need to operate the device.
Speed of doing things, since often making decisions involves split seconds and the question becomes does the person need more or less time to get a split second answer.
How many decisions need to be made to get anything done. When I need to do X I want to be able to do it as fast as possible. I don't want to have to navigate.
Again this review read like something only a personal computer person would be interested in. Not a person who actually uses a mobile device from the perspective of a mobile device.