Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Permalink for comment 354324
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-21
It's wrong to suggest that Apple is somehow ignoring the evolving security climate. Known exploits are regularly patched and the underlying OS keeps getting new security enhancements like •File Quarantine •Sandbox •Package and Code Signing •Application Firewall •Non-Executable (NX) Data •Address Space Randomization
For more info, see Jordan Hubbard's talk on the evolution of OS X at http://www.usenix.org/events/lisa08/tech/hubbard_talk.pdf
OS X doesn't have to be the most secure OS. It just has to be secure enough to keep criminal attention focused on Windows. Just remember that security and usability are often mutually exclusive, so all vendors are forced to balance the need to not inconvenience users with the need to be secure. If that were not the case we'd all be using PGP-enabled mail clients, every web stream would be SSL encrypted, we'd all be using multi-factor authentication, all our hard drives would have full-disk encryption, etc. etc.