Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Mar 2009 18:02 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Permalink for comment 354861
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-11
I'm not sure if it has already been pointed out, but the example regarding Apple is reasonable. A good portion of OS X is closed source -- including Cocoa and all the desktop environment. You don't get that with Darwin. You can download Darwin or some Darwin-based distro (there are one or two I think), and if I'm not mistaken, OS X's very own kernel -- it's just that nobody cares.
I'm not going to say anything about ESR, his reputation precedes him.
Edited 2009-03-24 22:02 UTC