Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Mar 2009 23:26 UTC, submitted by inkslinger
Permalink for comment 354901
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
No, it isn't. Not valid at all. I'll explain why in a bit.
Where did you get this from? Acid3 test compliance with recommended standards. Not with draft standards ... recommended standards.
You mis-understand. Let me give you an example or two.
DOM level 1 ... all browsers comply with this.
DOM level 2 ... doesn't break DOM level 1, but rather adds to it. Webkit (Safari and Chrome) and gecko (Firefox) both comply with DOM level 1 and DOM level 2, whereas IE8 doesn't comply with DOM level 2. DOM level 2 isn't draft ... it became the recommended standard in 2000. Acid3 tests for compliance (amongst other things) with DOM level 2.
DOM level 3 might still be draft ... and AFAIK no browsers implement DOM to that level yet ... but Acid3 doesn't test for it and when it is implemented it won't break DOM level 2.
Similarly for SVG. SVG 1.0 is quite old now, Acid3 looks for compliance for SVG 1.1 (which doesn't break SVG 1.0), and the draft in-development SVG is 1.2 (which doesn't break SVG 1.0 or SVG 1.1).
Only IE breaks these standards ... by not implementing them. Other browsers all comply to a very good level.
IE8 doesn't have a JIT Javascript compiler, so its performance is still WAYYY below par (as set by Safari, Firefox, Opera and Chrome).
Edited 2009-03-25 02:28 UTC