Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Mar 2009 18:02 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Permalink for comment 354918
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-07-13
Examples of this is trying to use Java/Javascript/Mono/etc on them. Sure, Java may be GPL, but if i want to do a closed implementation i still have to talk to Sun/Novell/Etc.. why is this necesary? It's not like i'm taking java and making it close..
You don't have to talk to anyone to use (GPL) Java on a platform. Oh, unless you want to take all that work for free and use it and close it up again. Is that what you want?
Don't you get the problem here is you want to get something for nothing and then close it up again. The problem is not with GPL Java but with your company's selfishness. If it doesn't want to use GPL Java then you company should implement a version itself, or quit whinging about it. In fact, the GNU team are generous enough to give a Java implementation with "Classpath exception" so you can use it with your own stuff and leave your own code closed. Ain't that real nice of them, so no need to kvetch about it, k?