Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Mar 2009 23:26 UTC, submitted by inkslinger
Permalink for comment 354930
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-05-12
Exactly!
When it comes to "standards", MS were very quick to buy influence and votes to make their Office Open XML a "standard", as it could be used as a selling-point and hence there was money in it for them.
However, IE8 is free, so there's little pressure on them to make it standards-compliant. No money in it, unlike Office, hence the "take what you're given and be grateful" attitude of MS.
So it can be seen that this "the standards are only draft" thing is just a smokescreen.