Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Mar 2009 23:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 355460
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-19
You're still thinking as a desktop user. Amiga's small memory footprint would have made it a good handheld OS at one time. The problem is that as AmigaOS 4.1 started to embrace modern programming practices their memory footprint started to grow. The more features they add the less competitive they become.
I think we should go with the Natami team and try to rejuvenate AmigaOS 3.9 and AROS 68k if we're going for any sort of Amiga platform integration that we had going for us back in the day.