Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Mar 2009 23:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 355507
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-17
If you have to change ISAs, the byte ordering is the last of the concerns regarding "performance" hits.
You have to recompile your code anyways... so what was your original point regarding endianess.?
I specially love this gem:
"I think Intel chips are only faster because of more compact instruction set and therefore more efficient use of the cache"
Really? I assume you have little to no clue regarding computer architecture. But by all means do not let that stop you from making authoritative statements regarding porting an operating system across different architectures.
Edited 2009-03-27 21:48 UTC