Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y Any discussion about GNOME vs. KDE is sure to end in tears. It's basically impossible to discuss which of these two Free desktop environments is better than the other, mostly because they cater to different types of people, with different needs and expectatotions. As such, Bruce Byfield decided to look at the two platforms from a different perspective: if we consider their developmental processes, which of the two is most likely to be more successful in the coming years?
Permalink for comment 355838
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I call BS
by VistaUser on Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:19 UTC
Member since:

During the 3.x series, KDE also was incrementally developed.

And current gnome, while incrementally developed, is very different from the original 2.0 release - many components have been rewritten, refactored or replaced.

When Gnome 3 is released, it may also once again be a major jump, however it would be one that is already being prototyped and written in parallel to normal gnome incremental development.

But if it is planned well, the jump should not be all that jarring for the users and there need not be a loss of functionality.

Reply Score: 1