Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y Any discussion about GNOME vs. KDE is sure to end in tears. It's basically impossible to discuss which of these two Free desktop environments is better than the other, mostly because they cater to different types of people, with different needs and expectatotions. As such, Bruce Byfield decided to look at the two platforms from a different perspective: if we consider their developmental processes, which of the two is most likely to be more successful in the coming years?
Permalink for comment 355845
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: There is no argument
by sbergman27 on Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:46 UTC in reply to "RE: There is no argument"
Member since:

I think GnomeDo is one of the strongest reasons not to use Gnome.

Why? GnomeDo is not part of Gnome. If I wrote an app called "KBabyMulcher", would that be a strong reason not to use KDE?

How about WinMulch? iMulch?

Edited 2009-03-30 19:48 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 8