Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Permalink for comment 356181
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Not at all.
Early on for KDE4 (2006/2007 timeframe) there wasn't KDE slowness, but there was slowness ... it was (largely) graphics driver slowness. It was slow on some systems as a result ... the fact that it was slow only on some systems tells you straight away that it wasn't KDE, but rather the particular underlying systems, that were slow.
That problem is fixed now, and hence, once again, KDE runs (universally) faster than GNOME.
This has recently been amplified considerably now that some popular GNOME distributions (such as Ubuntu and Mint) have started to include Mono.
Edited 2009-04-01 04:53 UTC