Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Apr 2009 16:36 UTC, submitted by Accident
Permalink for comment 357125
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-31
If there are so many well know problems with PulseAudio why aren't there more efforts being made to improve how it works .. better yet why aren't the ALSA people working with the PulseAudio people to make things better? That is one of the things I still ask about the OSS vs ALSA situation. But please respond to my PulseAudio question .. it seems to me to have alot of potential .. same goes for Phonon is there any effort being made by these competing technologies to interoperate? I mean they all do something good but right next to that is the fact that they all seem bent on muscling each out.