Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 17th Apr 2009 11:15 UTC, submitted by csynt
Permalink for comment 359048
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-11
Who really cares?
The fact is, this is little more significant than any 4 random members of the public being prosecuted. The only difference is that they made a website that accidentally, and quite randomly, got very popular.
One way or another, people will carry on copying and sharing, and trying to change that is a bit like trying to stop the sun rising in the morning.
There's still the ongoing battle against ISPs.
There's still the fact that encrypted file sharing hasn't even started to go mainstream.
There's still the fact that the above combined with knowing a bit more about who you're sharing with hasn't even begun, either. Right now, we're sharing with random individuals on the internet we don't know, and it's difficult to prosecute people. Imagine how hard it will get to prosecute people once this large group of people starts breaking down into inter-connected groups of people who know and trust each other?