Linked by Flatland_Spider on Sat 18th Apr 2009 08:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 359325
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-17
In some instances they will need more aggressive clock gating approaches, where they can isolate parts of the circuit and shut them off completely (although there is a penalty for re-starting that section of the circuit).
A lot of the research seems to be directed into reducing operational temperature, as temperature seems to be one of the principal components of leakage. I.e. cooler circuits = lower leakage.
Although the switching characteristics are not so "random" but there is a clear penalty for "wasted" power due to leakage.